As an anonymous user, you can only add new data. If you would like to also modify existing data, please create an account and indicate your languages on your user page.

DefinedMeaning talk:preposition (409140)

From OmegaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

A preposition can be a phrase, such as "in spite of", "with respect to". I change the definitions in English, French and Castilian for that.
But this is not all: is there any reason to restrict so much the definition? (Presently "A word or locution that works as a marker of the grammatical role of the following noun or noun phrase."). A preposition can be placed before a pronoun: "Give it to him.", before a verb: "It's beautiful to see, not good to eat.", before a clause: "I'm fed up with being waken up every night.", before an adjective: "Tomorrow the weather will be from cloudy to rainy.", before an adverb: "These pupils learn between slowly and very slowly.". See Wikipedia.
I propose as definition: "A word or locution able to act as a marker of the grammatical function of a following noun or noun phrase. (Some prepositions are also able to play the same role in front of other words or phrases.)". 01:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree with your proposal. Thanks. --InfoCan 14:37, 14 August 2012 (CEST)
Done in some 15:12, 14 August 2012 (CEST)
  • Actually, I think I agreed too quickly. I think the definition needs to be more succinct. A definition that requires a second sentence to deal with exceptions to the first sentence needs to be tightened. I modified the definition given in Wiktionary to the following, how does it look?
Any of a closed class of non-inflecting words typically employed to connect a noun or a pronoun, with some other word or phrase, and expressing a relation between them.
--InfoCan 19:49, 14 August 2012 (CEST)
I agree it should be one sentence, but a succinct definition of a complex notion won't fit. I don't like "typically" for 2 reasons: firstly, being ABLE to connect a noun is a requirement to be a preposition, secondly, many preposition have so many other common usages that this "typical" usage is no so typical. Moreover "Any close class" is just wrong. A preposition is not a class of word, but a word or a phrase. What about:
"A word or phrase able to connect a following noun or noun phrase (and often other parts of the speech) as a complement to some other part of the sentence, expressing a relation between them."
?-- 03:02, 15 August 2012 (CEST)
I got the "any of a closed class" from the Wiktionary definition, I think that should have been "any member of a closed class", meaning that the number of prepositions in a language is limited. In English they constitute a small number of functional words like to, on, off, etc. Their number is limited because you cannot create as preposition as easily as you can create, say, a verb from a noun (e.g., institution -> institutionalize). However, I am not sure whether it is important to mention this characteristic of prepositions in the definition. Either way, your last definition is a fine. --InfoCan 10:57, 16 August 2012 (CEST)
Thank you. Done in 4 languages. 12:17, 16 August 2012 (CEST)

Out of sync[edit]

  • The definition in language "bul" (Bulgarian) is out of sync.
  • The definition in language "nld" (Dutch) is out of sync.
  • The definition in language "deu" (German) is out of sync.
  • The definition in language "avk" (Kotava) is out of sync.
  • The definition in language "swe" (Swedish) is out of sync.