As an anonymous user, you can only add new data. If you would like to also modify existing data, please create an account and indicate your languages on your user page.

Meta talk:Functionality wanted

From OmegaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Too long[edit]

This page is too long and should be split. I suggest to move to the linguists parlour the discussion about inflexions. --Fiable.biz 07:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Using Bugzilla instead[edit]

I suggest to use the bugzilla instead of this wiki to deal with wanted functionalities because it manages better this kind of thing. You can make an advance search, get a list of "bugs" containing your key word, search the archive together with active bugs if you wish, close the bug easily without losing the discussion, change easily the status of a bug to "enhancement", prioritize the bugs etc.. "Functionality wanted" would of course be tagged as enhancements. Example.--Fiable.biz 03:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

This would be applicable only to things that need programming. Functionality implemented by altering or adding settings and relations in this wiki, eg. additional annotations, should be kept here. --Purodha Blissenbach 17:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Why? --Fiable.biz 13:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Bugzilla is the place where MediaWiki, its extensions, and Mediawiki foundation site related bugs and jobs are handled. The program code that OmegaWiki runs, is part of MediaWiki, but there is no OmegaWiki section there. Thus stuff that is not code related cannot be handled by Bugzilla. --Purodha Blissenbach 21:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
What would you called an "Omegawiki section"? There is a "component" of the "product" "MediaWiki extensions" called "Omegawiki". Isn't it enough? I don't see why we should restrain ourselves to write there even functionalities which don't need programming. However, real functionalities need programming. So what do you think of my idea for the wanted functionalities needing programming? --Fiable.biz 13:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Two periods[edit]

Is there a reason for having two periods at the end of this page's title? --Amir E. Aharoni 16:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The third one is a "functionality wanted". ;-) --Fiable.biz 13:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)