User:Kipcool/pensées

[edit] Mémo

How should we deal with words that are not assigned to a specific language, but are international, such as chemical symbols?

They may be "international", but they are also accepted as valid in each language that accepts them.

That is functionality that is in the data design. We have an idea on what it will look like but this will materialise when the time is there.

How to match classificators in Chinese (no equivalent word in French/English, therefore, no corresponding DefineMeaning)

There will be a DefinedMeaning consisting of a Chinese Expression and a Chinese Definition. So when there is no exact translation in English French, that is ok

Functionality seen on Oct 4 2007

Definitions. In LingoZ, definitions and synonyms are mixed. Many definitions are in fact a list of synonyms. In OmegaWiki, they are 2 separate things = much better
- French defined as "Français, langue parlée en France; le peuple français" = 2 definitions mixed...
License. OmegaWiki uses a free license, anyone can reuse the data freely (by respecting the license), and download the database in Development. In LingoZ, a word you add belongs to LingoZ. Their data are not free
Registering. Adding comment in OmegaWiki is possible without registering, while it is not possible in LingoZ. Thumbs down are also impossible without registering. Modifying a definition needs registering in both cases.
part of speech only in OW
example sentences only in OW
IPA only in OW
... I don't get why people dared comparing these two...